Further tales from Broadbandland
It seems that our previous post is not the only person to encounter difficulties with setting up on broadband - different supplier this time, but definitely same level of service...
LETTER 1
Leeds
August 2005
Dear Sir
Fault Reference BLAH BLAH
I arranged to be connected to XX Broadband on the 6th July. I carried out the procedures for ‘connecting the hardware’ as directed but I failed to make contact and consequently I began discussion as to the possible reasons for this failure through your helpline . By Friday, 8th July, nothing had been done to determine the ‘fault’(?) and even a long telephone call at premium rate did nothing but to demonstrate the embarrassingly inept service that XX is providing.
The initial difficulties of making contact with a ‘helpline’ are considerable (to say the least) but they pale into insignificance when compared with the conflicting ‘advice’ / ‘help’ that is proferred by various members of staff. And as for distinguishing a path through which I could channel my frustration, there seemed to be none (‘until I was connected’). For days I was told that the fault lay entirely around my computer and its connection and I became sick of explaining that this seemingly simple procedure had been checked repeatedly. Eventually, it was agreed that an engineer should call and, after the third ‘arrangement’, he did.
The engineer, monitored the telephone with total efficiency and announced that the line (2 Mb) in my contract was unable to be picked up and the problem would be resolved by downgrading to the slightly slower 1 Mb connection, that this would be done within a day and that I would be informed. (Question : How can you offer a service to a postcode in the suburbs of Leeds that was unavailable ?).
After two days, I had heard nothing and I was forced to resort to the telephone exchange and all its frustration. How can a company such as XX advertise its products in such a profligate fashion and, at the same time, allow a customer to hang on to a telephone for up to 70 minutes to enquire about a problem / fault that is entirely the company’s responsibility and still not provide a resolution or an apology ?
On Monday, 1st August, after at least a 60 minutes phone call, I was told that my problem would be resolved, that I should ring back to be informed. On at least ten attempts into 2nd August there was no response on this number and I was forced to repeat the procedure through the helpline. Again, total confusion, but eventually an operator told me that she would ring me back at 1.30 pm to explain the situation. You will not be surprised to hear that I received no call but idling by my computer, as I waited, I switched on and realised that I had been connected to BT Broadband – after one month, huge frustration, many hours of time wasted, and some expensive telephone calls. Ah, but I suppose that the shareholders are happy and that, after all, is your raison d’etre.
I feel that this whole saga could possibly be summed up in one unrequested telephone call some 7 or 8 days after what was to have been my connection. It was clearly from a call exchange, sponsored by XX, asking me whether I was pleased with my recently acquired XX Broadband etc. Could you please arrange another call from one of the Directors so that I could really express my feelings but on this occasion I would be appreciate it if it was not made at 8.59 pm when even double glazing merchants or Spanish Properties cowboys would hesitate to encroach one’s privacy.
I expect my contract to be revised, the service was established some 4 weeks after July 6, and that allowance should be made for the premium rate telephone calls I was forced to make. As for the time I wasted and the attendant frustration I leave it for you to consider but the least I would expect would be an apology.
THE IRONY?
This blogger was also a believer and did think they were connected but it was not to be. After a month of a 'hit and miss' service on broadband the horror was revealed, he was still using DIAL UP! Jeez! All is sorted now, but it took another 1,000 phone calls and another trip from the Engineer. The problem? In the junction box in the street. Never heard of checking postcodes against your service provision capabilities XX? Didn't think so.
LETTER 1
Leeds
August 2005
Dear Sir
Fault Reference BLAH BLAH
I arranged to be connected to XX Broadband on the 6th July. I carried out the procedures for ‘connecting the hardware’ as directed but I failed to make contact and consequently I began discussion as to the possible reasons for this failure through your helpline . By Friday, 8th July, nothing had been done to determine the ‘fault’(?) and even a long telephone call at premium rate did nothing but to demonstrate the embarrassingly inept service that XX is providing.
The initial difficulties of making contact with a ‘helpline’ are considerable (to say the least) but they pale into insignificance when compared with the conflicting ‘advice’ / ‘help’ that is proferred by various members of staff. And as for distinguishing a path through which I could channel my frustration, there seemed to be none (‘until I was connected’). For days I was told that the fault lay entirely around my computer and its connection and I became sick of explaining that this seemingly simple procedure had been checked repeatedly. Eventually, it was agreed that an engineer should call and, after the third ‘arrangement’, he did.
The engineer, monitored the telephone with total efficiency and announced that the line (2 Mb) in my contract was unable to be picked up and the problem would be resolved by downgrading to the slightly slower 1 Mb connection, that this would be done within a day and that I would be informed. (Question : How can you offer a service to a postcode in the suburbs of Leeds that was unavailable ?).
After two days, I had heard nothing and I was forced to resort to the telephone exchange and all its frustration. How can a company such as XX advertise its products in such a profligate fashion and, at the same time, allow a customer to hang on to a telephone for up to 70 minutes to enquire about a problem / fault that is entirely the company’s responsibility and still not provide a resolution or an apology ?
On Monday, 1st August, after at least a 60 minutes phone call, I was told that my problem would be resolved, that I should ring back to be informed. On at least ten attempts into 2nd August there was no response on this number and I was forced to repeat the procedure through the helpline. Again, total confusion, but eventually an operator told me that she would ring me back at 1.30 pm to explain the situation. You will not be surprised to hear that I received no call but idling by my computer, as I waited, I switched on and realised that I had been connected to BT Broadband – after one month, huge frustration, many hours of time wasted, and some expensive telephone calls. Ah, but I suppose that the shareholders are happy and that, after all, is your raison d’etre.
I feel that this whole saga could possibly be summed up in one unrequested telephone call some 7 or 8 days after what was to have been my connection. It was clearly from a call exchange, sponsored by XX, asking me whether I was pleased with my recently acquired XX Broadband etc. Could you please arrange another call from one of the Directors so that I could really express my feelings but on this occasion I would be appreciate it if it was not made at 8.59 pm when even double glazing merchants or Spanish Properties cowboys would hesitate to encroach one’s privacy.
I expect my contract to be revised, the service was established some 4 weeks after July 6, and that allowance should be made for the premium rate telephone calls I was forced to make. As for the time I wasted and the attendant frustration I leave it for you to consider but the least I would expect would be an apology.
THE IRONY?
This blogger was also a believer and did think they were connected but it was not to be. After a month of a 'hit and miss' service on broadband the horror was revealed, he was still using DIAL UP! Jeez! All is sorted now, but it took another 1,000 phone calls and another trip from the Engineer. The problem? In the junction box in the street. Never heard of checking postcodes against your service provision capabilities XX? Didn't think so.

